WRONG PROCESS, Edition-2
In conventional method environmentalist did not assess how much Sm3 of Oxygen lost due to the cutting of tree. Due to this decrease of O2, how much amount of carbon di-oxide remains unabsorbed and how much it contributes to the global warming. In the old process of assessing environmental impact, they did not assess economically how much suffered due to the destruction of natural eco-system.
Suppose for implementation of INR (RS) 10, 00,000 manufacturing project, we roughly required 1acre of land, we have to cut trees, which extended to an area roughly say 30,000 sq.ft. The cost of wood that are obtain by cutting of tree can assess by anyone. But the amount of Oxygen supply stop due to the cutting of this 30,000 sq. ft. of land full of tree will cross INR (RS) 60,00,000 and the excess Co2 remain unabsorbed is extra, which results in global warming.
Therefore, by assessing the environmental impact economically, then only we diversely reach to the people to apprehending them about the environmental impact properly. Rather than say big words of commitment or write big journal on environment impact, we have to reach to the common people and build awareness.
For that purpose, we have to change the process by which now the environmental impact assess. It is a wrong process.
No comments:
Post a Comment